Becoming, Not Learning About
The central failure of IT education, documented across a decade of employer advisory boards, NSF grants, and a four-round expert Delphi study, was not a curriculum problem. Programs were teaching the right body of knowledge. They were teaching it in the wrong mode: about the profession, rather than how to become part of it. You learn about a profession from lectures, textbooks, and credentials. You become a member of a profession by participating in its community, solving its real problems, and having the community recognize you as one of its own. The distinction is not subtle. It is the difference between a résumé and a practitioner.
The discovery a doctoral program makes
The researcher who spent a decade in workforce pipelines, watched graduates fail to perform, and eventually sat in Pepperdine classrooms unlearning behaviorism. The moment the assumption broke: that you can transfer a body of knowledge of a profession to a learner. You cannot. You can only provide the conditions for the learner to participate their way into it.
What communities of practice actually do
Wenger's definition: groups of people who share a concern, a set of problems, or a passion, and who deepen their knowledge by interacting on an ongoing basis. The key word is ongoing. A semester does not constitute ongoing. A capstone is not a community.
The identity problem
Professional identity is not awarded at graduation. It is constructed through participation and recognized by the community. The IA professional who is accepted as an IA professional by other IA professionals has become one. The graduate who holds an IA credential has not — not yet.
What AI accelerates
Learning about is now instantaneous, comprehensive, and indistinguishable from expertise at the surface. A model can explain the CISSP framework, the NIST standards, the five stages of incident response. It cannot replace participation in the response. The gap between appearing to know and being able to do — which the research showed was already wide — is now being manufactured at scale.
What this demands of institutions
Not a new curriculum. A different ambition: to move learners from the educational community into the professional community, not to credential them as if the two were the same thing. The instructor cannot make the move for the learner. The institution can only create the conditions under which the move is possible.